In partnership with
8 bits for a Byte: This edition breaks some uncomfortable truths about AI productivity— what's actually happening vs. what LinkedIn wants you to believe.
The highlights:
The human brain is hitting its processing limits with modern software complexity. Most orgs have no idea. (Bit #1)
Your PM just shipped a feature. Your designer pushed code. "Developer" doesn't mean what it used to. (Bit #3)
Within five years, every developer will manage a team—of AI agents. (Bit #4)
Those 10x productivity claims? Even the best companies are hitting a 60% adoption ceiling. (Bit #8)
This isn't a sponsored post. The frameworks powering this edition are influenced by the team at DX, and their research has genuinely shaped how I think about developer productivity. If you're exploring how to measure what actually matters (not just what's easy to count), their work is worth your time: getdx.com.
I'm currently exploring ways to partner with companies I genuinely believe in to bring subscriber perks and packages to this community. Stay tuned.
Book a Coaching 1:1 Call With Me
Walk into your next leadership meeting with a plan—not a pitch for more time. In one 30-minute session, I'll help you build a 10-page Strategic Implementation Framework tailored to your company'...
Not possible? Money back if you are not satisfied!
Let’s Get To It!
Welcome To AI Quick Bytes!
Bit 1: Software development has become so complex that the human mind is hitting its processing limits—and most organizations don't even realize it.
The Problem: The ever-growing number of tools, frameworks, and technologies is creating unprecedented cognitive load on developers. We've built systems so intricate that understanding them requires mental bandwidth beyond what evolution prepared us for. This isn't a productivity problem—it's a human capacity problem.
The Insight: Cognitive load—the mental processing required to perform a task—has emerged as one of three critical dimensions determining developer effectiveness. When cognitive load remains chronically high due to poorly documented code, fragmented systems, and constant context-switching, developers must devote enormous extra effort just to avoid mistakes. We've reached cognitive carrying capacity.
The Data:
14 actionable dimensions now comprise the Developer Experience Index, with cognitive load as a core driver
Organizations with lower cognitive load show 4-5x higher engineering speed and quality
eBay's deliberate cognitive load reduction contributed to 6x reduction in deployment lead times
ACTION BYTE: Audit your engineering environment for cognitive friction: unclear documentation, excessive context-switching, fragmented toolchains. These are the invisible taxes on human processing power.
How much could AI save your support team?
Peak season is here. Most retail and ecommerce teams face the same problem: volume spikes, but headcount doesn't.
Instead of hiring temporary staff or burning out your team, there’s a smarter move. Let AI handle the predictable stuff, like answering FAQs, routing tickets, and processing returns, so your people focus on what they do best: building loyalty.
Gladly’s ROI calculator shows exactly what this looks like for your business: how many tickets AI could resolve, how much that costs, and what that means for your bottom line. Real numbers. Your data.
Bit 2: Quote of the Week:
Robert Franklin
Bit 3: The Great Redefinition—"Developer" No Longer Means What You Think
The boundaries around who creates software are dissolving faster than organizations can adapt their worldview.
The Problem: For decades, "developer" meant someone with formal training writing production code. This definition is becoming obsolete. AI is democratizing software creation, but our measurement systems, career paths, and organizational structures remain locked in the old paradigm.
The Insight: Product managers, designers, and business analysts are increasingly using AI tools to generate working software. The future belongs to organizations that recognize this shift and adapt accordingly. But here's the nuance: we must distinguish between production-grade contributions and disposable AI-generated prototypes. Not all software creation is equal.
The Data:
Non-traditional contributors are increasingly shipping production software, not just prototypes
Accurate measurement now requires understanding both who contributes AND what type of contribution
The AI era demands we expand the definition while maintaining quality distinctions
ACTION BYTE: The expanding range of roles—from traditional engineers to non-technical professionals—who can now meaningfully contribute to software creation, enabled by AI tools.ACreate a "contributor spectrum" framework in your organization that acknowledges the expanding definition of who creates software while maintaining clear quality tiers. anI to
Spectrum Position | Role Examples |
Core Builders | Senior engineers, architects |
Full Stack Builders | Cross-trained PM/Design/Eng hybrids |
Technical Extenders | Designers pushing PRs, PMs building dashboards |
Empowered Creators | Product managers, analysts, ops |
Prompt-First Contributors | Business stakeholders, domain experts |
The Future of Shopping? AI + Actual Humans.
AI has changed how consumers shop, but people still drive decisions. Levanta’s research shows affiliate and creator content continues to influence conversions, plus it now shapes the product recommendations AI delivers. Affiliate marketing isn’t being replaced by AI, it’s being amplified.
Bit 4: The Rise of the Developer-Manager Hybrid
Within five years, every developer will manage a team—of AI agents.
The Problem: We're entering uncharted organizational territory. Autonomous agents are beginning to author pull requests, write tests, and ship code. But our mental models for work attribution remain rooted in individual human contribution.
The Insight: The most effective measurement approach treats AI agents as extensions of the developers who oversee them. This isn't just a metrics decision—it's a preview of the future of work. Developers will increasingly be measured like managers are today: based on the performance of their teams. The critical skill becomes operator effectiveness—how well you direct AI capabilities toward valuable outcomes.
The Data:
Agent-authored PRs should count toward team throughput, not as separate contributors
"Operator skill" a developer's ability to effectively direct and leverage AI tools and agents to produce valuable outcomes. Operator skill is emerging as a critical developer competency.
Block's AI agent "goose" represents early-stage human-AI team structures.
ACTION BYTE: Begin developing "AI operator" competencies in your developers now. Those who master human-AI team leadership will define the next era of software creation.
Bit 5: The Speed-Quality Balance That Separates Leaders from Laggards
AI-driven velocity gains look impressive on dashboards. The question is: what do they look like six months later?
The Problem: Organizations are celebrating early AI wins—faster code generation, shorter development cycles, impressive time savings. But short-term speed gains can mask long-term velocity killers if code quality and maintainability degrade.
The Insight: Code generated by AI may be less intuitive for human developers to understand, potentially creating bottlenecks during debugging and modification. The strategic response isn't to slow AI adoption—it's to pair every speed metric with a quality counterweight. Track AI-driven time savings alongside maintainability indicators. The goal: identify the balance point where AI enhances both speed AND sustainable code quality.
The Data:
AI tools can deliver impressive near-term speed gains
Code comprehension bottlenecks create long-term velocity drag
Leading organizations track both immediate AND horizon metrics for AI impact
ACTION BYTE: For every AI speed metric you track, designate a quality counterpart. Time-to-merge paired with post-merge defect rates. Code generation speed paired with code review complexity scores.
Bit 6: Sunday Funnies
The Future of AI in Marketing. Your Shortcut to Smarter, Faster Marketing.
This guide distills 10 AI strategies from industry leaders that are transforming marketing.
Learn how HubSpot's engineering team achieved 15-20% productivity gains with AI
Learn how AI-driven emails achieved 94% higher conversion rates
Discover 7 ways to enhance your marketing strategy with AI.
Bit 7: Flow State as Competitive Moat
"Getting into the zone" isn't soft psychology—it's becoming the scarcest strategic resource in software organizations.
The Problem: Developers speak of flow state—full immersion, energized focus, effortless productivity. Organizations nod along, then schedule back-to-back meetings that shatter this state repeatedly. We're systematically destroying our most valuable cognitive resource.
The Insight: Flow state isn't optional for high performance. Studies show developers who experience it regularly produce higher-quality products and demonstrate greater innovation. Yet our organizational structures treat interruptions as free. They aren't. The future belongs to companies that architect for flow as deliberately as they architect for scale.
The Data:
Frequent flow state experiences lead to higher productivity, innovation, and employee development
Interruptions and delays are primary flow-state destroyers
Pfizer explicitly targets flow state, empowering teams with dedicated improvement time and resources
ACTION BYTE: Calculate your "flow destruction cost"—every unnecessary meeting, notification, and context-switch carries a hidden productivity tax. Make it visible:
(Interruptions/day) × (Recovery minutes) × (Developers) × (Working days) × (Hourly cost ÷ 60)
Example: 6 interruptions/day × 20 min recovery × 100 devs × 250 days × $1.25/min = $3.75M annually in lost flow state
Bit 8: The Benchmarking Reality Check Your Board Presentation Needs
Those astronomical AI productivity claims on LinkedIn? Your peers aren't seeing them either.
The Problem: Leaders face pressure to show AI results matching viral claims. When internal results fall short, it creates doubt: Are we doing something wrong? Is our team underperforming? This benchmark anxiety paralyzes decision-making.
The Insight: Here's what nobody posting 10x claims will tell you: even leading organizations are only reaching around 60% active usage of AI tools. That's the ceiling at the best companies right now. The gap between hype and reality is industry-wide—and that's actually great news for you. The strategic opportunity isn't matching fictional benchmarks. It's exceeding realistic ones. Organizations with disciplined, data-driven AI adoption are pulling ahead precisely because they're not chasing myths.
The Data:
~60% active AI tool usage is the current ceiling at top-performing organizations
Industry benchmarks built from millions of data samples reveal the actual performance curve
Developer sentiment and AI-driven time savings have improved significantly over the past 12 months—progress is real, just not 10x
ACTION BYTE: Get industry-specific AI adoption benchmarks for your next board presentation. Replace "we're behind LinkedIn claims" with "we're in the top quartile of verified peers."
Until next time, take it one bit at a time!
Rob
P.S. Thanks for making it to the end—because this is where the future reveals itself.
Ramp AI Index measures the adoption rate of artificial intelligence products and services among American businesses. Our sample includes more than 50,000 American businesses and billions of dollars in corporate spend using data from Ramp’s corporate card and bill pay platform.
Great tool showing Overall Adoption Rates by: Overall, Sector, Size and model.